Collaboration: The Paradigm of Practice Approach between the Forensic Psychiatrist and the Forensic Psychologist
نویسندگان
چکیده
The importance and relevance of forensic practice to societal evolution has increased exponentially in recent years. As society evolves in its understanding of the complex relationships between mankind and society, we rely more and more on the services of forensic experts. This article elucidates the professions of forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology. We examine the two distinct professions from the spectrum of collaboration, integration of services, differences, and similarities. We also compare and contrast the educational background and training requirements for these two professions; and present illustrative scenarios and real life examples of the daily functions of both professionals. Lastly, we present demographic data for the areas of employment, numbers, and geographic distribution of the two professions. Forensic psychiatry is the interface between medicine and law, while forensic psychology is the interface between psychology and law. As such, these professions are mired with complexities and challenged by vulnerabilities. Professionals from both fields can serve as expert witnesses in court and therefore face similar challenges in their course of professional practice. Collaboration between these two professions has the potential to increase both the credibility and utility of forensic services to the courts, the individuals served, and the general public.
منابع مشابه
Scope of Practice of Forensic Midwifery: An Integrative Review
Background & aim: Forensic midwifery is a new major which has been established in response to the need of endangered women for forensic services and also the lack of service provision in this domain. However, there are ambiguities in the definition of this major and its scope of practice. The present study was conducted to investigate the scope of practice in forensic ...
متن کاملThe consultation model and forensic psychiatric practice.
Seymour Pollack developed three categorizing definitions which provided forensic psychiatry with a logical framework for development as a subspecialty of general psychiatry. The first definition separated the body of information related to the interaction oflaw and psychiatry required by the general psychiatrist from information specific to the subspecialty of forensic psychiatry. The general p...
متن کاملThe practice of forensic psychiatry: perils, problems, and pitfalls.
The practice of forensic psychiatry can be exciting, rewarding, and fulfilling; however, there are also a number of pitfalls that the practitioner may encounter. Scheduling conflicts may pose significant problems for the busy practitioner, especially one who has an active treatment practice. Differences of opinion between and among forensic psychiatrists can be difficult for some psychiatrists....
متن کاملPractical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys.
Alan A. Stone, MD has delineated clearly the areas of ethical conflict for the forensic psychiatrist. He focuses primarily on issues of criminal law and psychiatry and the forensic psychiatrist as double agent. However, he also alludes to the four issues concerning ethical boundaries of forensic psychiatry. His first concern is whether psychiatry has anything true to say that the courts should ...
متن کامل[New legal regulations concerning appointment of forensic experts in legal incapacity].
AIM The Statue changing the Code of Civil Procedure enforced interchangeable calling of psychiatrist or neurologist as a medical expert for proceedings concerning the incapacitated which aroused objection from psychiatrists because of separate competencies for these specialists and the expectations on the professional code relating to the field of knowledge and competency of a psychiatrist. The...
متن کامل